constitutional crap


khufu ([email protected])
Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:00:53 -0500


> j
> My post is constitutionally protected since it is merely an exercise
> of my freedom of expression, a right which cannot be abridged.

> And if anyone
> has the right to question my comments and twisted interpretations of
> interviews, it can only be Bono since the constitutional right to
> privacy is purely personal and can only be brought by real parties in
> interest.

sorry j, the constitution only regulates *government* actions and it's
reach is limited, bono a citizen of ireland in ireland is not a member
of the protected class *we the people*.

> In this case, you have no standing whatsoever to say that I
> am "ridiculous" and have "poor taste." Of course the exception to this
> is that you worship Bono as your God, then I would be infringing on
> your freedom of religion by degrading your God. So is that your
> religion? If it is, I am sorry then (really).

you are misusing the legal concept of standing. anyone who reads what
you wrote has the right to state an opinion that you are ridiculous
and have poor taste. and your interpretation of religious freedom is
also another indication you don't know squat about constitutional law.

a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.

k^



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Tue Dec 08 1998 - 21:03:55 PST