Re: Pop listed as 3rd worst album of 1997

Pirate Bob ([email protected])
Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:15:55 -0400

Just to clear one thing up they rated it as a "3 out of 10" not as the
3rd worst album of 1997.

But I totally agree with Marc. Not only did the author of the review use
"Cuz", he started the sentence with it. You can't even use "Because" to
start a sentence! Also to use the phrase "nine fucking months", I was
always taught that if you need to use profanity to get your point across
then you have a low vocabulary.

But giving the site the benefit of the doubt, I decided to look up other
things. Like the new Depeche Mode tribute album.

The author of that review refers to, "the questionable overall quality
of Depeche Mode's body of work." Excuse me? Then the other uses fictious
large words to make herself seem more important. Antithetically? Is this
a real world?

Then I looked up one of my favorite albums of last year, Transister.
True it wasn't anything new or groundbreaking, but I loved it. The
author of this review said that the entire album was plagerized from
Garbage. First, aside from having a electronic poppish sound and a
female lead singer, the album sounds nothing like Garbage's first album.
Secondly, if the reviewer thinks that Garbage was the first group to
have this type of sound he shouldn't be writing reviews he should be
reading them. Bands like Curve especially had this sound years before
Garbage even started cutting demos for their album.

So I wouldn't take the opinions of this site too seriously, since the
people that write the reviews are illiterate uniformed postering

And that's all I have to say about that...

Pirate Bob

"I smoked myself into a haze in the afternoon"
                                  - Ash, A Life Less Ordinary

"Ernest Hemingway once wrote, 'The world is a fine place and worth fighting for', I agree with the second part" - Detective William Somerset, Se7en

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Thu Jul 30 1998 - 20:18:57 PDT